Showing posts with label Flow. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flow. Show all posts

Sunday, March 27, 2022

Insertion flowmeters

This section does not describe a particular type of flowmeter, but rather a design that may be implemented for several different kinds of flow measurement technologies. When the pipe carrying process fluid is large in size, it may be impractical or cost-prohibitive to install a full-diameter flowmeter to measure fluid flow rate. A practical alternative for many applications is the installation of an insertion flowmeter: a probe that may be inserted into or extracted from a pipe, to measure fluid velocity in one region of the pipe’s cross-sectional area (usually the center).

A classic example of an insertion flowmeter element is the Annubar, a form of averaging pitot tube pioneered by the Dieterich Standard corporation. The Annubar flow element is inserted into a pipe carrying fluid where it generates a differential pressure for a pressure sensor to measure:

The Annubar element may be extracted from the pipe by loosening a “gland nut” and pulling the assembly out until the end passes through a handball valve. Once the element has been extracted this far, the ball valve may be shut and the Annubar completely removed from the pipe:

For safety reasons, a “stop” is usually built into the assembly to prevent someone from accidentally pulling the element all the way out with the valve still open.

Other flowmeter technologies manufactured in insertion form include vortex, turbine, and thermal mass. An insertion-type turbine flowmeter appears in the following photographs:

If the flow-detection element is compact rather than distributed (as is certainly the case with the turbine flowmeter shown above), care must be taken to ensure correct positioning within the pipe. ince flow profiles are never completely flat, any insertion meter element will register a greater flow rate at the center of the pipe than near the walls. Wherever the insertion element is placed in the pipe diameter, that placement must remain consistent through repeated extractions and re-insertions, or else the effective calibration of the insertion flowmeter will change every time it is removed and re-inserted into the pipe. Care must also be taken to insert the flowmeter so the flow element points directly upstream, and not at an angle.

A unique advantage of insertion instruments is that they may be installed in an operating pipe by using specialized hot-tapping equipment. A “hot tap” is a procedure whereby a safe penetration is made into a pipe while the pipe is carrying fluid under pressure. The first step in a hot-tapping operation is to weld a “saddle tee” fitting on the side of the pipe:

Next, a ball valve is bolted onto the saddle tee flange. This ball valve will be used to isolate the insertion instrument from the fluid pressure inside the pipe:

A special hot-tapping drill is then bolted to the open end of the ball valve. This drill uses a high-pressure seal to contain fluid pressure inside the drill chamber as a motor spins the drill bit. The ball valve is opened, then the drill bit is advanced toward the pipe wall where it cuts a hole into the pipe. Fluid pressure rushes into the empty chamber of the ball valve and hot-tapping drill as soon as the pipe wall is breached:

Once the hole has been completely drilled, the bit is extracted and the ball valve shut to allow removal of the hot-tapping drill:

Now there is a flanged and isolated connection into the “hot” pipe, through which an insertion flowmeter (or another instrument/device) may be installed.

Hot-tapping is a technical skill, with many safety concerns specific to different process fluids, pipe types, and process applications. This brief introduction to the technique is not intended to be instructional, but merely informational.

List of Prominent Suppliers: ABB, Baker Hughes, Burkert, Comate, CS Instruments, DropsA, Dwyer, E+E, Endress + Hauser, Flomec, FlowTech, Flow-Tronic, Fluid Components International, Gavin, GHM Group, Hach, Holykell, ISOIL, Kobold, McCrometer, MC Techgroup, Mecon, Metri, Omega, Oval, Praher Plastics, Primayer, Prisma, Pulsar, Q&T, Sierra, Solidat, Supmea, Tecfluid, Teledyne, Thermo Scientific, Titan, VP Instruments, Weber

Follow to get new posts and updates about the blog. Appreciate your feedback!

Change-of-quantity flow measurement

Flow, by definition, is the passage of material from one location to another over time. So far this chapter has explored technologies for measuring flow rate en route from source to destination. However, a completely different method exists for measuring flow rates: measuring how much material has either departed or arrived at the terminal locations over time.

Mathematically, we may express flow as a ratio of quantity to time. Whether it is volumetric flow or mass flow we are referring to, the concept is the same: quantity of material moved per quantity of time. We may express average flow rates as ratios of changes:

Where,

W = Average mass flow rate

Q = Average volumetric flow rate

m = Change in mass

V = Change in volume

t = Change in time

Suppose a water storage vessel is equipped with load cells to precisely measure weight (which is directly proportional to mass with constant gravity). Assuming only one pipe entering or exiting the vessel, any flow of water through that pipe will result in the vessel’s total weight changing over time:

If the measured mass of this vessel decreased from 74,688 kilograms to 70,100 kilograms between 4:05 AM and 4:07 AM, we could say that the average mass flow rate of water leaving the vessel is 2,294 kilograms per minute over that time span.

Note that this average flow measurement may be determined without any flowmeter of any kind installed in the pipe to intercept the water flow. All the concerns of flowmeters studied thus far (turbulence, Reynolds number, fluid properties, etc.) are completely irrelevant. We may measure practically any flow rate we desire simply by measuring stored weight (or volume) over time. A computer may do this calculation automatically for us if we wish, on practically any time scale desired.

Now suppose the practice of determining average flow rates every two minutes was considered too infrequent. Imagine that operations personnel require flow data calculated and displayed more often than just 30 times an hour. All we must do to achieve better time resolution is take weight (mass) measurements more often. Of course, each mass-change interval will be expected to be less with more frequent measurements, but the amount of time we divide by in each calculation will be proportionally smaller as well. If the flow rate happens to be absolutely steady, we may sample mass as frequently as we might like and we will still arrive at the same flow rate value as before (sampling mass just once every two minutes). If, however, the flow rate is not steady, sampling more often will allow us to better see the immediate “ups” and “downs” of flow behavior.

Imagine now that we had our hypothetical “flow computer” take weight (mass) measurements at an infinitely fast pace: an infinite number of samples per second. Now, we are no longer averaging flow rates over finite periods of time; instead, we would be calculating instantaneous flow rate at any given point in time.

Calculus has a special form of symbology to represent such hypothetical scenarios: we replace the Greek letter “delta” (, meaning “change”) with the roman letter “d” (meaning differential ).A simple way of picturing the meaning of “d” is to think of it as meaning an infinitesimal interval of whatever variable follows the “d” in the equation72. When we set up two differentials in a quotient, we call the d/d fraction a derivative. Re-writing our average flow rate equations in derivative (calculus) form:

Where,

W = Instantaneous mass flow rate

Q = Instantaneous volumetric flow rate

dm = Infinitesimal (infinitely small) change in mass

dV = Infinitesimal (infinitely small) change in volume

dt = Infinitesimal (infinitely small) change in time

We need not dream of hypothetical computers capable of infinite calculations per second in order to derive a flow measurement from a mass (or volume) measurement. Analog electronic circuitry exploits the natural properties of resistors and capacitors to essentially do this very thing in real-time:

In the vast majority of applications, you will see digital computers used to calculate average flow rates rather than analog electronic circuits calculating instantaneous flow rates. The broad capabilities of digital computers virtually ensure they will be used somewhere in the measurement/control system, so the rationale is to use the existing digital computer to calculate flow rates (albeit imperfectly) rather than complicate the system design with additional (analog) circuitry. As fast as modern digital computers are able to process simple calculations such as these anyway, there is little practical reason to prefer analog signal differentiation except in specialized applications where high-speed performance is paramount.

Perhaps the single greatest disadvantage to inferring flow rate by differentiating mass or volume measurements over time is the requirement that the storage vessel has but one flow path in and out. If the vessel has multiple paths for the liquid to move in and out (simultaneously), any flow rate calculated on change-in-quantity will be a net flow rate only. It is impossible to use this flow measurement technique to measure one flow out of multiple flows common to one liquid storage vessel.

A simple “thought experiment” confirms this fact. Imagine a water storage vessel receiving a flow rate of 200 gallons per minute. Next, imagine that same vessel emptying water out of a second pipe at the exact same flow rate: 200 gallons per minute. With the exact same flow rate both entering and exiting the vessel, the water level in the vessel will remain constant. Any change-of-quantity flow measurement system would register zero change in mass or volume over time, consequently calculating a flow rate of absolutely zero. Truly, the net flow rate for this vessel is zero, but this tells us nothing about the flow in each pipe, except that those flow rates are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.

Process/instrument suitability

Every flow-measuring instrument exploits a physical principle to measure the flow rate of the fluid stream. Understanding each of these principles as they apply to different flow-measurement technologies is the first and most important step in properly applying a suitable technology to the measurement of a particular process stream flow rate. The following table lists the specific operating principles exploited by different flow measurement technologies:

A potentially important factor in choosing an appropriate flowmeter technology is energy loss caused by pressure drop. Some flowmeter designs, such as the common orifice plate, are inexpensive to install but carry a high price in terms of the energy lost in permanent pressure drop (the total, non-recoverable loss in pressure from the inlet of the device to the outlet, not the temporary pressure difference between inlet and vena contracta). Energy costs money, and so industrial facilities would be wise to consider the long-term cost of a flowmeter before settling on the one that is cheapest to install. It could very well be, for example, that an expensive venturi tube will cost less after years of operation than a cheap orifice plate.

In this regard, certain flowmeters stand above the rest: those with obstruction fewer flow tubes. Magnetic and ultrasonic flowmeters have no obstructions whatsoever in the path of the flow. This translates to (nearly) zero permanent pressure loss along the length of the tube, and therefore. Thermal mass and straight-tube Coriolis flowmeters are nearly obstruction less, while vortex and turbine meters are only slightly worse.

Follow to get new posts and updates about the blog. Appreciate your feedback!

Weighfeeders

A special type flowmeter suited for powdered or granular solids is the weighfeeder. One of the most common weighfeeder designs consists of a conveyor belt with a section supported by rollers coupled  to one or more load cells, such that a fixed length of the belt is continuously weighed:

The load cell measures the weight of a fixed-length belt section, yielding a figure of material weight per linear distance on the belt. A tachometer (speed sensor) measures the speed of the belt. The product of these two variables is the mass flow rate of solid material “through” the weighfeeder:

Where,

W = Mass flow rate (e.g. pounds per second)

F = Force of gravity acting on the weighed belt section (e.g. pounds)

v = Belt speed (e.g. feet per second)

d = Length of weighed belt section (e.g. feet)

A small weighfeeder (about two feet in length) is shown in the following photograph, the weighfeeder being used to feed powdered soda ash into water at a municipal filtration plant to neutralize pH:

In the middle of the belt’s span (hidden from view) is a set of rollers supporting the weight of the belt and of the soda ash piled on the belt. This load cell array provides a measurement of pounds material per foot of belt length (lb/ft).

As you can see in this next picture, the soda ash powder simply falls of the far end of the conveyor belt, into the water below:

The speed sensor measures belt speed in feet per minute (ft/min). This measurement, when multiplied by the pounds-per-foot measurement sensed by the load cells, translates into a mass flow rate (W) in units of pounds per minute (lb/min). A simple unit conversion (×60) expresses the mass flow rate in units of pounds per hour (lb/h). A photograph of this weighfeeder’s display screen shows these variables:

Note that the belt loading of 1.209 lb/ft and the belt speed of 0.62 feet per minute do not exactly equate71 to the displayed mass flow rate of 43.7 lb/h. The reason for this discrepancy is that the camera’s snapshot of the weighfeeder display screen happened to capture an image where the values were not simultaneous. Weighfeeders often exhibit fluctuations in belt loading during normal operation, leading to fluctuations in calculated mass flow rate. Sometimes these fluctuations in measured and calculated variables do not coincide on the display screen, given the latency inherent to the mass flow calculation (delaying the flow rate value until after the belt loading has been measured and displayed).

List of Prominent Suppliers: ABB, Ados, AEP Transducers, Alps, Althen Sensors, Ametek, Anadolu, Andilog, Angst+Pfister, ASA-RT, Avery Weigh-Tronix, Barbal, Baumer, BCM Sensor, Bongshin Loadcell, Bosche, Brosa, Burster, Cardinal, CAS, Cleveland Motion Controls, Cometech, DFE, Dini Argeo, Dinaksa, Eagle Microsystems, Eilersen, Enerpac, Epoch, Europress, FMS, Futek, Gavin, Gerfan, GTM, Haehne, Hardy Process Solutions, HBM, Honeywell, Instron, Interface Inc, Kubota, Kyowa, LCT, Lorenz, Magtrol, Manyyear, ME, MeasureX, Megatron, Minebea intec, Omega, PCE, Precia Molen, PT, Pulseletronic, Rice Lake Weighing Systems, Rinstrum, Sartorius, Scaime, Schenck Process, Seegate Corporation, Sensocar, Sensotec, Sensotronic, Sensy, Sherborne Sensors, Siemens, Soway, Sreeka, Starrett, Stephens Mfg., Strainsert Co., Tamtron, Transducer Techniques, UTICell, Vetec, Wika, XSensors, Yuttah, Zwick/Roell

Follow to get new posts and updates about the blog. Appreciate your feedback!

Sunday, March 20, 2022

Density and temperature measurement (coriolis flowmeter)

The tubes within a Coriolis flowmeter are shaken at their mechanical resonant frequency to maximize their shaking motion while minimizing electrical power applied to the force coil. The electronics module uses a feedback loop between the sensor coils and the shaker coil to maintain the tubes in a continuous state of resonant oscillation. This resonant frequency changes with process fluid density, since the effective mass of the fluid-filled tubes changes with process fluid density, and mass is one of the variables influencing the mechanical resonant frequency of any elastic structure.

Note the “mass” term in the following formula, describing the resonant frequency of a tensed string:

Where,

f = Fundamental resonant frequency of string (Hertz)

L = String length (meters)

FT = String tension (newtons)

μ = Unit mass of string (kilograms per meter)

A fluid-filled tube is a close analog to a tensed string, with tube stiffness analogous to string tension and liquid density analogous to unit mass. So long as the spring constant (tube stiffness) is known, the resonant frequency of the tubes’ vibration serves to indicate the unit mass of the tubes, which in turn represents fluid density given the known internal volume of the tubes.

Temperature changes have the potential to interfere with this density measurement because temperature affects the elasticity of metal (Young’s modulus). This is why all Coriolis flowmeters are equipped with RTD temperature sensors to continuously monitor the temperature of the vibrating tube(s). The flowmeter’s microprocessor takes this tube temperature measurement and uses it to compensate for the resulting elasticity changes based on prior modeling of the tube metal characteristics. In other words, the flowmeter’s microprocessor continuously updates the force variable (FT ) representing tube stiffness in the resonant frequency equation so that the frequency will always be a reliable indicator of unit mass (fluid density). This temperature measurement happens to be accessible as an auxiliary output signal, which means a Coriolis flowmeter may double as a (very expensive!) temperature transmitter in addition to measuring mass flow rate and fluid density.

The ability to simultaneously measure three process variables (mass flow rate, temperature, and density) makes the Coriolis flowmeter a very versatile instrument indeed. This is especially true when the flowmeter in question communicates digitally using a “Fieldbus” standard rather than an analog 4-20 mA signal. Fieldbus communication allows multiple variables to be transmitted by the device to the host system (and/or to other devices on the same Fieldbus network), allowing the Coriolis flowmeter to do the job of three instruments!

An example of a Coriolis mass flowmeter being used as a multi-variable transmitter appears in the following photographs. Note the instrument tag labels in the close-up photograph (FT, TT, and DT), documenting its use as a flow transmitter, temperature transmitter, and density transmitter, respectively:

Coriolis flowmeter capabilities and limitations

Even though a Coriolis flowmeter inherently measures mass flow rate, the continuous measurement of fluid density allows the meter to calculate volumetric flow rate if this is the preferred means of expressing fluid flow. The relationship between mass flow (W), volumetric flow (Q), and mass density (ρ) are quite simple:

All the flowmeter’s computer must do to output a volumetric flow measurement is taken the mass flow measurement value and divide that by the fluid’s measured density. A simple exercise in dimensional analysis (performed with metric units of measurement) validates this concept for both forms of the equation shown above:

Coriolis mass flowmeters are very accurate and dependable. They are also completely immune to swirl and other fluid disturbances, which means they may be located nearly anywhere in a piping system with no need at all for straight-run pipe lengths upstream or downstream of the meter. Their natural ability to measure true mass flow, along with their characteristic linearity and accuracy, makes them ideally suited for custody transfer applications (where the flow of fluid represents products being bought and sold).

The American Gas Association (AGA) formalized the use of Coriolis mass flowmeters for the measurement of natural gas with their Report #11. This standard is equivalent to AGA #3 for orifice meters, AGA #7 for turbine meters, and AGA #9 for ultrasonic meters.

Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of Coriolis flowmeters is their high initial cost, especially for large pipe sizes. Coriolis flowmeters are also more limited in operating temperature than other types of flowmeters and may have difficulty measuring low-density fluids (gases) and mixed-phase (liquid/vapor) flows. The bent tubes used to sense process flow may also trap process fluid inside to the point where it becomes unacceptable for hygienic (e.g. food processing, pharmaceuticals) applications. Straight-tube Coriolis flowmeter designs, and designs where the angle of the tubes is slight, fare better in this regard than the traditional U-tube Coriolis flowmeter design. However, an advantage of U-shaped tubes is that they aren’t as stiff as straight tubes, and so straight-tube Coriolis flowmeters tend to be less sensitive to low flow rates than their U-tube counterparts.

Thermal flowmeters

The wind chill is a phenomenon common to nearly everyone who has ever lived in a cold environment. When the ambient air temperature is substantially colder than the temperature of your body, heat will transfer from your body to the surrounding air. If there is no breeze to move air past your body, the air molecules immediately surrounding your body will begin to warm up as they absorb heat from your body, which will then decrease the rate of heat loss. However, if there is even a slight breeze of air moving past your body, your body will come into contact with more cool (unheated) air molecules than it would otherwise, causing a greater rate of heat loss. Thus, your perception of the surrounding temperature will be cooler than if there were no breeze.

We may exploit this principle to measure mass flow rate, by placing a heated object in the midst of a fluid flow stream, and measuring how much heat the flowing fluid convects away from the heated object. The “wind chill” experienced by that heated object is a function of true mass flow rate (and not just volumetric flow rate) because the mechanism of heat loss is the rate at which fluid molecules contact the heated object, with each of those molecules having a definite mass.

The simplest form of the thermal mass flowmeter is the hot-wire anemometer, used to measure air speed. This flowmeter consists of a metal wire through which an electric current is passed to heat it up. An electric circuit monitors the resistance of this wire (which is directly proportional to wire temperature because most metals have a definite temperature coefficient of resistance). If air speed past the wire increases, more heat will be drawn away from the wire and cause its temperature to drop. The circuit senses this temperature change and compensates by increasing current through the wire to bring its temperature back up to the setpoint. The amount of current sent through the wire becomes a representation of the mass air flow rate past the wire.

Most mass air flow sensors used in automotive engine control applications employ this principle. It is important for engine control computers to measure mass air flow and not just volumetric air flow because it is important to maintain proper air/fuel ratio even if the air density changes due to changes in altitude. In other words, the computer needs to know how many air molecules are entering the engine per second in order to properly meter the correct amount of fuel into the engine for complete and efficient combustion. The “hot wire” mass air flow sensor is simple and inexpensive to produce in quantity, which is why it finds common use in automotive applications.

Industrial thermal mass flowmeters usually consist of a specially designed “flow tube” with two temperature sensors inside: one that is heated and one that is unheated. The heated sensor acts as the mass flow sensor (cooling down as flow rate increases) while the unheated sensor serves to compensate for the “ambient” temperature of the process fluid.

A typical thermal mass flow tube appears in the following diagrams (note the swirl vanes in the close-up photograph, designed to introduce large-scale turbulence into the flow stream to maximize the convective cooling effect of the fluid against the heated sensor element):

The simple construction of thermal mass flowmeters allows them to be manufactured in very small sizes. The following photograph shows a small device that is not only a mass flow meter but also a mass flow controller with its own built-in throttling valve mechanism and control electronics. To give you a sense of scale, the tube fittings have seen on the left- and right-hand sides of this device are 1/4 inch, making this photograph nearly full-size:

An important factor in the calibration of a thermal mass flowmeter is the specific heat of the process fluid. “Specific heat” is a measure of the amount of heat energy needed to change the temperature of a standard quantity of a substance by some specified amount. Some substances have much greater specific heat values than others, meaning those substances have the ability to absorb (or release) a lot of heat energy without experiencing a great temperature change. Fluids with high specific heat values make good coolants because they are able to remove much heat energy from hot objects without experiencing great increases in temperature themselves. Since thermal mass flowmeters work on the principle of convective cooling, this means a fluid having a high specific heat value will elicit a greater response from a thermal mass flowmeter than the exact same mass flow rate of a fluid having a lesser specific heat value (i.e. a fluid that is not as good of a coolant).

This means we must know the specific heat value of whatever fluid we plan to measure with a thermal mass flowmeter, and we must be assured its specific heat value will remain constant. For this reason, thermal mass flowmeters are not suitable for measuring the flow rates of fluid streams whose chemical composition is likely to change over time. This limitation is analogous to that of a pressure sensor used to hydrostatically measure the level of liquid in a vessel: in order for this level-measurement technique to be accurate, we must know the density of the liquid and also be assured that density will be constant over time.

Thermal mass flowmeters are simple and reliable instruments. While not as accurate or tolerant of piping disturbances as Coriolis mass flowmeters, they are far less expensive.

Perhaps the greatest disadvantage of thermal mass flowmeters is their sensitivity to changes in the specific heat of the process fluid. This makes the calibration of any thermal mass flowmeter specific for one composition of fluid only. In some applications such as automotive engine intake air flow, where the fluid composition is constant, this limitation is not a factor. In many industrial applications, however, this limitation is severe enough to prohibit the use of thermal mass flowmeters. Industrial applications for thermal mass flowmeters include natural gas flow measurement (non custody transfer), and the measurement of purified gas flows (oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen) where the composition is known to be very stable.

Another (potential) limitation of thermal mass flowmeters is the sensitivity of some designs to changes in flow regime. Since the measurement principle is based on heat transfer by fluid convection, any factor influencing the convective heat-transfer efficiency will translate into a perceived difference in mass flow rate. It is a well-known fact in fluid mechanics that turbulent flows are more efficient at convecting heat than laminar flows because the “stratified” nature of a laminar flow stream impedes heat transfer across the fluid width. In some thermal flowmeter designs, the walls of a heated metal tube serve as the “hot” element cooled by the fluid, and the difference between the rate of heat transferred by a laminar flow stream from the walls of a heated tube versus a turbulent flow stream can be great. Therefore, a change in flow regime (from turbulent to laminar, and visa-versa) will cause a calibration shift for this design of thermal mass flowmeter.

List of Prominent Suppliers: ABB, Bronkhorst, Brooks, Cameron, Endress + Hauser, Flexim, Holykell, KEM, Kobold, Krohne, Omega, Oval, Q&T, Rheonik, Siemens, Sierra, SKE, Technoton, Yokogawa

Follow to get new posts and updates about the blog. Appreciate your feedback!

Practical Coriolis flowmeter construction

We cannot build a Coriolis flowmeter exactly like the water hose or lawn sprinkler unless we are willing to let the process fluid exit the tubing, so a common Coriolis flowmeter design uses a U-shaped tube that redirects the fluid flow back to the center of rotation. The curved end of the flexible U-tube is forced to shake back and forth by an electromagnetic force coil (like the force coil on an audio speaker) while the tube ends anchor to a stationary manifold:

If the fluid inside the tube is stagnant (no flow), the tube will simply vibrate back and forth with the applied force. However, if fluid flows through the tube, the moving fluid molecules will experience acceleration as they travel from the anchored base to the tube’s rounded end, then experience deceleration as they travel back to the anchored base. This continual acceleration and subsequent deceleration of new mass generate a Coriolis force altering the tube’s motion.

This Coriolis force causes the U-tube assembly to twist. The tube portion carrying fluid from the anchored base to the end tends to lag in motion because the fluid molecules in that section of the tube are being accelerated to a greater lateral velocity. The tube portion carrying fluid from the end back to the anchored base tends to lead in motion because those molecules are being decelerated back to zero lateral velocity. As the mass flow rate through the tube increases, so does the degree of twisting. By monitoring the severity of this twisting motion, we may infer the mass flow rate of the fluid passing through the tube:

In order to reduce the amount of vibration generated by a Coriolis flowmeter, and more importantly, to reduce the effect any external vibrations may have on the flowmeter, two identical Utubes are built next to each other and shaken in complementary fashion (always moving in opposite directions). Tube twist is measured as relative motion from one tube to the next, not as the motion between the tube and the stationary housing of the flowmeter. This (ideally) eliminates the effect of any common-mode vibrations on the inferred flow measurement:

Viewed from the end, the complimentary shaking and twisting of the tubes look like this:

Great care is taken by the manufacturer to ensure the two tubes are as close to identical as possible: not only are their physical characteristics precisely matched but the fluid flow is split very evenly between the tubes64 so their respective Coriolis forces should be identical in magnitude.

A photograph of a Rosemount (Micro-Motion) U-tube Coriolis flowmeter demonstration unit shows the U-shaped tubes (one tube is directly above the other in this picture, so you cannot tell there are actually two U-tubes):

A closer inspection of this flowmeter shows that there are actually two U-tubes, one positioned directly above the other, shaken in complementary directions by a common electromagnetic force coil:

The force coil works on the same principle as an audio speaker: AC electric current passed through a wire coil generates an oscillating magnetic field, which acts against a permanent magnet’s field to produce an oscillating force. In the case of an audio speaker, this force causes a lightweight cone to move, which then creates sound waves through the air. In the case of the Coriolis meter assembly, the force pushes and pulls between the two metal tubes, causing them to alternately separate and come together (shake in opposite directions).

Two magnetic displacement sensors monitor the relative motions of the tubes and transmit signals to an electronics module for digital processing. One of those sensor coils may be seen in the previous photograph. Both the force coil and the sensor coil are nothing more than permanent magnets surrounded by movable copper wire coils. The main difference between the force coil and the sensor coil is that the force coil is powered by an AC electric current to impart a vibratory force to the tubes, whereas the sensor coils are both unpowered so they can detect tube motion by generating AC voltage signals to be sensed by the electronics module. The force coil is shown in the left-hand photograph, while one of the two sensor coils appears in the right-hand photograph:

The two AC signals generated by the sensor coils provide data from which the electronics package may interpret fluid density and mass flow rate. The frequency of the two coils’ signals is inversely related to fluid density because a denser fluid will cause the tubes to have greater mass and therefore vibrate at a lower frequency. The phase shift of the two coils’ signals is directly related to mass flow rate because a greater mass flow rate will cause the tubes to twist to a greater degree, causing the sensors’ signals to shift further out of phase with each other.

Advances in sensor technology and signal processing have allowed the construction of Coriolis flowmeters employing straighter tubes than the U-tube unit previously illustrated and photographed. Straighter tubes are advantageous for reasons of reduced plugging potential and the ability to easily drain all liquids out of the flowmeter when needed. In straight-tube Coriolis flowmeters, we still find the same general design of a force coil flanked by matching sensor coils measuring vibration frequency (for density measurement) and phase shift (for mass flow measurement).

Matched tubes and electronics

The tubes inside a Coriolis flowmeter are not just conduits for fluid flow, they are also precision spring elements and volume chambers. As such, it is important to precisely know the spring characteristics and precise dimensions of these tubes so both mass flow and density may be inferred from tube motion. Every Coriolis flow element is factory-tested to determine the flow tubes’ mechanical properties, then the electronic transmitter is programmed with these parameters describing the tubes’ mechanical properties. The following photograph shows a close-up view of the nameplate on a Rosemount (Micro-Motion) Coriolis mass flowmeter, showing the physical constant values determined for that specific flow tube assembly at the time of manufacture:

This means every Coriolis flowmeter element (the tube and sensor assembly) is unique, with no two identical in behavior. Consequently, the transmitter (the electronics package outputting the process variable signals) must be programmed with values describing the element’s behavior, and the complete flowmeter is shipped from the manufacturer as a matched set. You cannot interchange elements and transmitters without re-programming the transmitters with the new elements’ physical constant values.

List of Prominent Suppliers: ABB, Bronkhorst, Brooks, Cameron, Endress + Hauser, Flexim, Holykell, KEM, Kobold, Krohne, Omega, Oval, Q&T, Rheonik, Siemens, Sierra, SKE, Technoton, Yokogawa

Follow to get new posts and updates about the blog. Appreciate your feedback!

Most Popular